--- Comment #8 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2009-02-03 15:09 ---
Great.
--
bonzini at gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #7 from vmakarov at redhat dot com 2009-02-03 15:06 ---
I don't see anymore code difference (only a bit different hard registers are
used) on mentioned functions for code generated with the old RA and IRA.
Probably it was fixed with a fix in regmove which was submitted as a
--- Comment #6 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2009-02-03 13:58 ---
News?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37437
--- Comment #5 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-21 21:13 ---
What does regmove change, i.e. which of the many things that regmove does, is
helpful for the test case for this PR?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37437
--- Comment #4 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-10-30 02:04 ---
Change Core 2 cost with
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37948#c1
doesn't help. Re-enable regmove with
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16571
fixes the performance regression.
--
hjl d
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37437
--- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-09-09 03:26 ---
I believe this is a duplicate of PR 37364.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37437
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-09 00:43 ---
Looks IRA related.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from tim at klingt dot org 2008-09-09 00:41 ---
Created an attachment (id=16262)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16262&action=view)
compressed preprocessed source
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37437
