--- Comment #28 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2009-02-03 09:54 ---
Am I right that the bug is just at -O, not at -O2? 4.4 -O2 is worse than 4.4
-O2 -fno-strict-aliasing, but are they better than 4.3 -O2 or worse?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36861
--- Comment #27 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-24 10:20
---
GCC 4.3.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #26 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-22 03:02
---
Richard has reproduced the bad behavior. So, this is not UNCONFIRMED. It's an
optimization regression; hence P2.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #25 from lothar at tradescape dot biz 2008-10-10 15:58 ---
I was running the code on my Lenovo T61 Laptop:
$ cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 15
model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T7700
