--- Comment #6 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-03-27 19:05 ---
Fixed.
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRM
--- Comment #5 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-27 18:56 ---
Subject: Bug 35657
Author: hjl
Date: Thu Mar 27 18:55:36 2008
New Revision: 133651
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=133651
Log:
2008-03-27 H.J. Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Backport from mainl
--- Comment #4 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-27 18:53 ---
Subject: Bug 35657
Author: hjl
Date: Thu Mar 27 18:52:18 2008
New Revision: 133649
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=133649
Log:
2008-03-27 H.J. Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR target/35657
--- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-03-25 00:42 ---
This patch will align DFP to its natural boundary.
Index: gcc/config/i386/i386.c
===
--- gcc/config/i386/i386.c (revision 1917)
+++ gcc/config/i38
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-03-22 00:27 ---
It is a question how TDmode should be aligned on stack when
passing to a function. I will ask it on the ia32 psABI group.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35657
--- Comment #1 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2008-03-21 20:53 ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> ix86_function_arg_boundary returns PARM_BOUNDARY for TDmode
> for ia32. Should it return 128bit? The psABI isn't clear on
> it. I think it should be aligned at 128bit.
Yes, because it is moved t
