[Bug target/34628] [4.2/4.3 Regression] problems with inlining on ARM

2008-01-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-09 15:56 --- Trying someone else - Eric, any clue about post-increment? -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug target/34628] [4.2/4.3 Regression] problems with inlining on ARM

2008-01-03 Thread rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-03 21:23 --- (In reply to comment #7) > The final tree IL looks good, so I suspect the RTL loop optimizer gets this > wrong. > > add r1, sp, #56 // upper loop-bound; should have been #12 > I actually wanted to say 'should

[Bug target/34628] [4.2/4.3 Regression] problems with inlining on ARM

2008-01-03 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-03 18:58 --- The final tree IL looks good, so I suspect the RTL loop optimizer gets this wrong. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug target/34628] [4.2/4.3 Regression] problems with inlining on ARM

2008-01-03 Thread tbm at cyrius dot com
--- Comment #6 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2008-01-03 18:22 --- (In reply to comment #2) > I see different IL for 4.2 compared to 4.3, is the bug present in 4.3? Can > you > attach the optimized tree dump? I also get a segfault with the testcase and 4.3.0 20070916. The original progra

[Bug target/34628] [4.2/4.3 Regression] problems with inlining on ARM

2008-01-03 Thread tbm at cyrius dot com
-- tbm at cyrius dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34628

[Bug target/34628] [4.2/4.3 Regression] problems with inlining on ARM

2008-01-03 Thread tbm at cyrius dot com
--- Comment #5 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2008-01-03 18:07 --- Created an attachment (id=14870) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14870&action=view) optimized tree dump (4.2) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34628

[Bug target/34628] [4.2/4.3 Regression] problems with inlining on ARM

2008-01-03 Thread tbm at cyrius dot com
--- Comment #4 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2008-01-03 18:03 --- Bugzilla wraps the testcase in a way that some commented out is no longer commented out and so you don't see the segfault. Here's the testcase again with proper wrapping: typedef unsigned short u16; typedef unsigned char u8

[Bug target/34628] [4.2/4.3 Regression] problems with inlining on ARM

2008-01-02 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-02 23:14 --- Put into WAITING state until the information requested in Comment #2 is available. -- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug target/34628] [4.2/4.3 Regression] problems with inlining on ARM

2008-01-01 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-01 17:42 --- I see different IL for 4.2 compared to 4.3, is the bug present in 4.3? Can you attach the optimized tree dump? -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added -