--- Comment #35 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-04 08:10
---
Subject: Bug 30406
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Sun Mar 4 08:10:25 2007
New Revision: 122523
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=122523
Log:
PR target/30406
* config/rs6000/rs6000
--- Comment #34 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-13 19:04
---
(In reply to comment #32)
> This was on my list of patches to submit today really, I finally actually got
> time to able to submit patches today. I was able to submit two other patches
> today and I have another
--- Comment #33 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2007-02-10 22:44 ---
Subject: Re: ICE in LOGICAL(8) functions
Thanks for the advice, I'll try to follow it next time.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30406
--- Comment #32 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-10 22:42
---
This was on my list of patches to submit today really, I finally actually got
time to able to submit patches today. I was able to submit two other patches
today and I have another one in testing right now.
--
--- Comment #31 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-10 22:21
---
(In reply to comment #30)
> (1) do you need a regtesting of the patch on 4.2 and OSX 10.4?
> Will 4.2.0 20070124 good enough or should I upgrade to a more
> recent version?
It's OK. The change is simple and that
--- Comment #30 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2007-02-10 22:12 ---
Subject: Re: ICE in LOGICAL(8) functions
Francois-Xavier,
Thanks for the work. In order to improve future contributions,
I have a few questions:
(1) do you need a regtesting of the patch on 4.2 and OSX 10.4?
Wil
--- Comment #29 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-10 17:24
---
Hi Dominique,
Patch posted (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-02/msg00927.html), so you
look how it's done. Patches in PR tend to not get reviewed, so we need people
to post them to the list. Yes, it takes
--- Comment #28 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2007-01-29 20:47 ---
Subject: Re: ICE in LOGICAL(8) functions
> I suppose Andrew should submit it for review by the PowerPC maintainers.
> If he doesn't have time, you could do it (unless he objects):
Never do today what someone else
--- Comment #27 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-29 17:57
---
(In reply to comment #26)
> (In reply to comment #25)
> > What is the fate of the patch in comment #22?
>
> I suppose Andrew should submit it for review by the PowerPC maintainers.
I will try to regest test it la
--- Comment #26 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-29 15:30
---
(In reply to comment #25)
> What is the fate of the patch in comment #22?
I suppose Andrew should submit it for review by the PowerPC maintainers. If he
doesn't have time, you could do it (unless he objects): bo
--- Comment #25 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2007-01-29 15:13 ---
What is the fate of the patch in comment #22?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30406
--- Comment #24 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2007-01-13 17:09 ---
I have applied the change to the latest snapshot (4.3.0 20070112) and the tests
compile now without error on OSX 10.3.9.
Thanks.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30406
--- Comment #23 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-11 08:08
---
The same code seems to be present in 4.1 and 4.2 branches. Andrew, would you
mind include add a testcase to testsuite/gfortran.dg/ when you commit a patch?
(if Andrew doesn't commit the patch, same request for th
--- Comment #22 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-10 23:20
---
It should be rewritten as:
if ((INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (valtype)
&& GET_MODE_BITSIZE (TYPE_MODE (valtype)) < BITS_PER_WORD)
|| POINTER_TYPE_P (valtype))
mode = TARGET_32BIT ? SImode : DImode;
else
--- Comment #21 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-10 23:09
---
Happens on all PPC including GNU/Linux.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #20 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-10 23:04
---
Ignore that last comment (though that is where the problem is).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30406
--- Comment #19 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-10 23:04
---
if ((INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (valtype)
&& TYPE_PRECISION (valtype) < BITS_PER_WORD)
|| POINTER_TYPE_P (valtype))
mode = TARGET_32BIT ? SImode : DImode;
else
mode = TYPE_MODE (valtype);
--- Comment #18 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-10 23:02
---
rs6000_function_value looks at TYPE_PRECISION
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
18 matches
Mail list logo
