[Bug target/30153] -fPIC failure

2011-12-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30153 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/30153] -fPIC failure

2010-02-05 Thread reza dot yazdani at amd dot com
--- Comment #4 from reza dot yazdani at amd dot com 2010-02-05 23:11 --- (In reply to comment #3) > "The optimization performed is correct because: > > In C++ (not in C) a const modifier in a global variable has internal > linkage (i.e. it is treated like a static variable) and therefo

[Bug target/30153] -fPIC failure

2010-02-05 Thread reza dot yazdani at amd dot com
--- Comment #3 from reza dot yazdani at amd dot com 2010-02-05 21:10 --- "The optimization performed is correct because: In C++ (not in C) a const modifier in a global variable has internal linkage (i.e. it is treated like a static variable) and therefore the optimization performed is

[Bug target/30153] -fPIC failure

2007-05-16 Thread price at ifa dot hawaii dot edu
--- Comment #2 from price at ifa dot hawaii dot edu 2007-05-17 03:19 --- This is also a problem on my amd64 Gentoo laptop, using gcc version Gentoo 4.1.1-r3. I searched the binutils Bugzilla, but could not find a bug filed for this problem. Because the problem disappears when optimisa

[Bug target/30153] -fPIC failure

2006-12-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-24 04:49 --- As far as I can tell this is really a binutils issue. the difference between static inline and just static is where foo is emitted. In the static inline case, it is emitted after bar. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugz