[Bug target/29512] compile time hog / deadloop.

2007-03-02 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #16 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-02 15:16 --- *** Bug 31015 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug target/29512] compile time hog / deadloop.

2006-12-01 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #15 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-01 16:04 --- Not a regression. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29512

[Bug target/29512] compile time hog / deadloop.

2006-12-01 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #14 from pluto at agmk dot net 2006-12-01 12:24 --- no backport to 4.1/4.2 ? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29512

[Bug target/29512] compile time hog / deadloop.

2006-10-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #13 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-21 21:03 --- Fixed so closing. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Sta

[Bug target/29512] compile time hog / deadloop.

2006-10-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #12 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-21 20:58 --- *** Bug 24308 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29512

[Bug target/29512] compile time hog / deadloop.

2006-10-21 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #11 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-21 10:09 --- Fixed for 4.3. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work

[Bug target/29512] compile time hog / deadloop.

2006-10-21 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-21 10:05 --- Subject: Bug 29512 Author: rguenth Date: Sat Oct 21 10:05:21 2006 New Revision: 117927 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=117927 Log: 2006-10-21 Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[Bug target/29512] compile time hog / deadloop.

2006-10-19 Thread hubicka at ucw dot cz
--- Comment #9 from hubicka at ucw dot cz 2006-10-19 23:32 --- Subject: Re: compile time hog / deadloop. Just for a record, we discussed this a bit on IRC. I origionally wrote that loop copying logic from alias.c just to be sure that all the fields from base clases are merged into the

[Bug target/29512] compile time hog / deadloop.

2006-10-19 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-19 20:47 --- Btw. - completely killing the BINFO walking bootstraps and regtests ok... -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29512

[Bug target/29512] compile time hog / deadloop.

2006-10-19 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-19 20:45 --- I wonder why we walk the class hierarchy using the BINFOs at all. It contains lots of recursively empty structures - maybe better just walk the TYPE_FIELDS list recursively? -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org cha

[Bug target/29512] compile time hog / deadloop.

2006-10-19 Thread hubicka at ucw dot cz
--- Comment #6 from hubicka at ucw dot cz 2006-10-19 19:36 --- Subject: Re: compile time hog / deadloop. > > > --- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-19 15:15 > --- > It _looks_ like we're needlessly recursing into the BINFOs in the i386 > backend. Wha