[Bug target/27991] [4.2 regression] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands

2006-07-07 Thread pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-07 23:39 --- Fixed. -- pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug target/27991] [4.2 regression] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands

2006-07-07 Thread pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-07 23:39 --- Subject: Bug 27991 Author: pbrook Date: Fri Jul 7 23:38:56 2006 New Revision: 115272 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=115272 Log: 2006-07-08 Paul Brook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR target/

[Bug target/27991] [4.2 regression] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands

2006-07-06 Thread pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-06 15:26 --- It looks like this is a latent bug. My patch allows negxf to operate on integer registers (previously it was only implemented on FP regs). This causes the register allocator to make different register choices, and rel

[Bug target/27991] [4.2 regression] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands

2006-07-05 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-05 18:00 --- 68K is not release-critical. However, Paul, would you please look into this, as Andreas believes this to be caused by your change? -- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed

[Bug target/27991] [4.2 regression] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands

2006-06-11 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot |

[Bug target/27991] [4.2 regression] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands

2006-06-11 Thread schwab at suse dot de
--- Comment #1 from schwab at suse dot de 2006-06-11 20:43 --- Created an attachment (id=11651) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11651&action=view) Testcase -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27991