--- Comment #6 from dje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-26 21:40 ---
Patch applied to 4.2.
--
dje at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NE
--- Comment #5 from dje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-26 21:36 ---
Subject: Bug 27544
Author: dje
Date: Sat Aug 26 21:36:39 2006
New Revision: 116478
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116478
Log:
PR target/27544
* doc/extend.texi (PowerPC Variable A
--- Comment #4 from dje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-26 21:33 ---
Created an attachment (id=12144)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12144&action=view)
documentation patch
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27544
--- Comment #3 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-24 05:29 ---
Yup. New feature lacking documentation. We've always treated those as
documentation quality regressions.
So confirmed.
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-24 05:20 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> This can't possibly be a regression.
Why? It is a user visible regression as now preprocessed sources include the
altivec attribute while before it used vector_size.
--
http://gcc.gnu
--- Comment #1 from echristo at apple dot com 2006-07-24 05:07 ---
This can't possibly be a regression.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27544
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27544
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27544
