[Bug target/27303] crash at unalign access

2006-07-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-24 04:46 --- Invalid as mentioned by Eric because we don't have a testcase. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/27303] crash at unalign access

2006-07-23 Thread echristo at apple dot com
--- Comment #9 from echristo at apple dot com 2006-07-24 03:22 --- No testcase after 3 mos. No need to keep this open. -- echristo at apple dot com changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug target/27303] crash at unalign access

2006-04-26 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-26 16:50 --- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #4) > > We need a testcase to go any further. > Source code is too big to send. I can send map, nm, elf oupts, etc... > to you. Would it make any sense ? No, that does

[Bug target/27303] crash at unalign access

2006-04-26 Thread mehmet dot ekici at alcatel dot com dot tr
--- Comment #7 from mehmet dot ekici at alcatel dot com dot tr 2006-04-26 08:20 --- (In reply to comment #4) > We need a testcase to go any further. Source code is too big to send. I can send map, nm, elf oupts, etc... to you. Would it make any sense ? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzil

[Bug target/27303] crash at unalign access

2006-04-26 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-26 08:15 --- A testcase is a source that we can compile and run that reproduces the failure. Preferrably small. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27303

[Bug target/27303] crash at unalign access

2006-04-26 Thread mehmet dot ekici at alcatel dot com dot tr
--- Comment #5 from mehmet dot ekici at alcatel dot com dot tr 2006-04-26 07:04 --- (In reply to comment #4) > We need a testcase to go any further. What do you mean with a test case ? I looked at http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html and dit nt see any description of testcase. -- http://g

[Bug target/27303] crash at unalign access

2006-04-25 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-25 17:28 --- We need a testcase to go any further. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug target/27303] crash at unalign access

2006-04-25 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-25 12:07 --- Look at the assembly output of gcc (-S) and see if there is an appropriate alignment directive before the entry for AMLogging in the bss section. If there is, the assembler/linker are at fault. Otherwise please att

[Bug target/27303] crash at unalign access

2006-04-25 Thread mehmet dot ekici at alcatel dot com dot tr
--- Comment #2 from mehmet dot ekici at alcatel dot com dot tr 2006-04-25 11:49 --- (In reply to comment #1) > First, gcc 3.4.3 is no longer in active maintainance, the oldest still > maintained version is 4.0.3. Second, please read the bugreporting guidelines > and provide a testcase

[Bug target/27303] crash at unalign access

2006-04-25 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-25 11:36 --- First, gcc 3.4.3 is no longer in active maintainance, the oldest still maintained version is 4.0.3. Second, please read the bugreporting guidelines and provide a testcase for the problem. Third, this may be as well