--- Comment #13 from jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com 2009-06-10 11:45
---
(In reply to comment #12)
> Subject: Bug 26397
>
> Author: dje
> Date: Thu Nov 6 15:32:40 2008
> New Revision: 141646
>
> URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=141646
> Log:
> PR target
--- Comment #12 from dje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-06 15:34 ---
Subject: Bug 26397
Author: dje
Date: Thu Nov 6 15:32:40 2008
New Revision: 141646
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=141646
Log:
PR target/26397
* config/rs6000/aix.h (LIBSTDCXX_STA
--- Comment #11 from dje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-15 15:34 ---
You can try manually linking the program with libsupc++.a as well:
http://codesynthesis.com/~boris/blog/2006/12/10/statically-linking-on-aix/
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26397
--- Comment #10 from stuart dot downing at sungard dot com 2008-10-15
13:43 ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Proper G++ exception handling requires shared libraries.
>
Why? This is not the case on other target platforms.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26397
--- Comment #9 from dje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-15 12:29 ---
Proper G++ exception handling requires shared libraries.
--
dje at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from stuart dot downing at sungard dot com 2006-07-07 18:28
---
We are also observing this symptom, but only when gcc is configured with
--disable-shared.
This configuration...
/devp/src/bld/gcc4.1.1.s/usr/local/bin/g++ -v
Target: powerpc-ibm-aix5.1.0.0
Configured with:
--- Comment #7 from stuart dot downing at sungard dot com 2006-07-07 18:25
---
Created an attachment (id=11852)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11852&action=view)
Sample code that exhibits segmentation fault
This is a simplified code sample that produces the symptom
--- Comment #6 from mark dot woollard at macrovision dot com 2006-06-07
23:13 ---
I have come across this issue too. It seems that if the exception being thrown
is passed back across a function call then the rethrow will cause a segfault.
If the catch and rethrow are in the same functio
--- Comment #5 from michael dot klein at fazi dot de 2006-04-24 09:26
---
Actually, gcc is installed both with *and* without "-X.Y.Z" on all machines
here except the Debian Linuxes (AIX, HP-UX, Solaris), but none of them carries
a g++ ending with "-X.Y.Z".
According to truss, libstdc++
--- Comment #4 from dje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-14 17:52 ---
The testcase works for me. I am a little confused about what you actually have
installed if you have "gcc" and "g++" installed with different names (with and
without -4.0.2). Do you have a consistent G++ installation o
--- Comment #3 from michael dot klein at fazi dot de 2006-02-21 16:21
---
Didn't help, same result with powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0-g++ (there is no
powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0-g++-4.0.2 here).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26397
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-21 16:05 ---
$ powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0-gcc-4.0.2 exctest.cpp -lstdc++ -o exctest
Can you try linking with:
$ powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0-g++-4.0.2 exctest.cpp -o exctest
instead and see if that helps?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugz
--- Comment #1 from michael dot klein at fazi dot de 2006-02-21 15:57
---
Created an attachment (id=10887)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10887&action=view)
Preprocessed source
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26397
13 matches
Mail list logo