--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26018
--- Comment #13 from uweigand at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-31 01:11
---
Fixed in mainline and 4.1.
--
uweigand at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #12 from uweigand at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-31 01:09
---
Subject: Bug 26018
Author: uweigand
Date: Tue Jan 31 01:09:36 2006
New Revision: 110423
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=110423
Log:
PR target/26018
* config/s390/s390.c (str
--- Comment #11 from uweigand at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-31 01:06
---
Subject: Bug 26018
Author: uweigand
Date: Tue Jan 31 01:06:16 2006
New Revision: 110422
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=110422
Log:
PR target/26018
* config/s390/s390.c (str
--- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-30 18:38
---
(In reply to comment #9)
> The problem is the construct &&label1 - &&label2 used in the
> source (b.t.w. is this usage of the GCC &&label extension
> valid in the first place?
It is "correct" but not does could me
--- Comment #9 from uweigand at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-30 18:32
---
This appears to be a pre-existing bug in s390_decompose_address,
that happens to be triggered by this particular glibc code.
The problem is the construct &&label1 - &&label2 used in the
source (b.t.w. is this usag
--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-30 13:15 ---
s390z08:/# gcc -O -c vfprintf.i -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: s390-suse-linux
Configured with: ../configure --enable-threads=posix --prefix=/usr
--with-local-prefix=/usr/local --infodir=/usr/share/info
--mandir=/u
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-30 13:14 ---
Created an attachment (id=10761)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10761&action=view)
assembly output
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26018
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-30 13:14 ---
Created an attachment (id=10760)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10760&action=view)
full testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26018
--- Comment #5 from uweigand at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-30 12:31
---
The reduced testcase build fine for me with current 4.1 ...
Can you send me the full test case, and the assembler file you get?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26018
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-29 17:17 ---
matching the error message posted, not the reduced testcase, the offending
assembly instruction is
la %r1,.L737-.L212
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26018
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-29 17:01 ---
Can you show what is on that line? It might be easier to figure out what is
going wrong.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26018
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-29 16:51 ---
The testcase assembles correctly with -O -march=g5 and errors with -O
-march=z900
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-29 16:49 ---
Created an attachment (id=10754)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10754&action=view)
reduced testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26018
14 matches
Mail list logo
