--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-02 16:51 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Perhaps - however, it's not been fixed on the 4.0 or 4.1 branches...
But this is not a regression so closing as fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Re
--- Comment #7 from jconner at apple dot com 2006-10-02 16:44 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Shouldn't this bug be marked as closed now?
Perhaps - however, it's not been fixed on the 4.0 or 4.1 branches...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25376
--- Comment #6 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2006-10-01
00:29 ---
Shouldn't this bug be marked as closed now?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25376
--- Comment #5 from jconner at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-14 17:23 ---
Subject: Bug 25376
Author: jconner
Date: Tue Feb 14 17:23:00 2006
New Revision: 110987
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=110987
Log:
Radar 4373419
PR target/25376
* gcc/varasm.c (function_sectio
--- Comment #4 from jconner at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-13 18:12 ---
Subject: Bug 25376
Author: jconner
Date: Mon Feb 13 18:12:17 2006
New Revision: 110917
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=110917
Log:
PR target/25376
* varasm.c (function_section): Check for sect
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-03 20:21 ---
Updated patch posted:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-02/msg00226.html
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-12 18:20 ---
Confirmed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCON
--- Comment #1 from jconner at apple dot com 2005-12-12 18:11 ---
I have a patch for this I'll submit to gcc-patches.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25376
