--- Comment #17 from tedoc2000 at gmail dot com 2005-11-16 18:57 ---
Okay.. This definitely seems to be a problem with having libiconv.a in
%{prefix}/lib.
If I move /opt/OPSWbuildtools/1.0.1/lib/libconv.a to
/opt/OPSWbuildtools/1.0.1/lib/libconv.a.blah and run my program, it works as
exp
--- Comment #16 from tedoc2000 at gmail dot com 2005-11-16 02:10 ---
Okay.. So it turns out that having my version of libiconv.a in
/opt/OPSWbuildtools/1.0.1/lib causes the problem.
I compiled it --enable-static --disable-dynamic with gcc 3.3.2..
Seeing if not doing that helps.
As I men
--- Comment #15 from tedoc2000 at gmail dot com 2005-11-15 21:27 ---
Okay so it wasn't the --with-local-prefix.
It was the fact that I used --prefix=/opt/OPSWbuildtools/1.0.1.
If I use a directory that doesn't already exist then I get my desired results.
So that makes us ask. "Well what
--- Comment #14 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-15 15:38
---
(In reply to comment #13)
> (In reply to comment #12)
> > specify --with-local-prefix=/opt/OPSWbuildtools/1.0.1
> > Am I missing something?
> Yes it sounds like it is picking up the wrong header otherwise.
s/heade
--- Comment #13 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-15 15:38
---
(In reply to comment #12)
> specify --with-local-prefix=/opt/OPSWbuildtools/1.0.1
> Am I missing something?
Yes it sounds like it is picking up the wrong header otherwise.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org cha
--- Comment #12 from tedoc2000 at gmail dot com 2005-11-15 02:08 ---
--with-local-prefix seems to be causing the problem. Not sure why.
Basically I'm trying to build a set of tools for complining our product that
only references things under a particular root (/opt/OPSWbuildtools/1.0.1 i
--- Comment #11 from tedoc2000 at gmail dot com 2005-11-15 00:59 ---
Okay.. recompiling gcc-3.4.4 with the same options as I used in compiling
gcc-3.3.2 seems to have fixed the problem.
Now working on figuring out with configure options cause the problem.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bug
--- Comment #10 from tedoc2000 at gmail dot com 2005-11-14 20:39 ---
Hmm..
I'm getting the same exact behaviour on my AIX 5.1 box :/
So maybe it has something to do with the way I configured gcc 3.4.4 (which is a
little different than how I did 3.3.2)
Let me try re-building 3.4.4 with t
--- Comment #9 from dje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-14 20:28 ---
I do not have access to an AIX 4.3.2 system, but I compiled the reconstructed C
testcase with:
gcc-3.3.3 on AIX 5.1
gcc-3.4.4 on AIX 5.1
gcc-4.0.2 on AIX 5.1
gcc-4.1 experimental on AIX 5.2
All four compilers produced
--- Comment #8 from tedoc2000 at gmail dot com 2005-11-14 20:18 ---
oops I meant ld not ln in b) above
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24856
10 matches
Mail list logo
