--- Comment #8 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2007-08-28 10:08 ---
FIxed by http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-07/msg00354.html
--
ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2007-08-28 10:04 ---
This is fixed in current mainline, gcc version 4.3.0 20070827 produces:
foo:
pushl %ebx
movl8(%esp), %ebx
xorl%edx, %edx
movl12(%esp), %ecx
.p2align 4,,7
.p2al
--- Comment #6 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2007-01-15 08:46 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> The fact that the index variable is chosen to start with 1 instead of zero is
> more interesting. It does not really matter that much, since both
> possibilities have exactly the same cost. Bu
--- Comment #5 from pluto at agmk dot net 2006-09-20 13:25 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Following patch to ix86_address_cost:
this patch causes the PR29124.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24669
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-25 02:17 ---
Confirmed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCON
