--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||4.0.0 3.4.4 4.0.2
Known to work||3.4
--- Comment #6 from amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2005-10-21 07:49
---
Fixed on all active branches
--
amodra at bigpond dot net dot au changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-21 07:48
---
Subject: Bug 24465
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-3_4-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-21 07:48:26
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog
--- Comment #4 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-21 07:37
---
Subject: Bug 24465
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-21 07:36:56
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog
--- Comment #3 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-21 07:33
---
Subject: Bug 24465
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-21 07:33:30
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog
gcc/config/rs6000: rs6000.c
--- Comment #2 from amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2005-10-21 05:05
---
Actually, it's not that RS6000_PIC_OFFSET_TABLE_REGNUM isn't being set up, it's
that RS6000_PIC_OFFSET_TABLE_REGNUM is wrongly being using for tls accesses.
As currently implemented by gcc, powerpc tls uses [EMAI
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-21 03:47 ---
Confirmed, This is a latent bug but shows up as testsuite regressions which is
why I am marking it as a regression.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Add
