--- Comment #7 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-01 02:25 ---
Subject: Bug 24036
Author: jsm28
Date: Fri Dec 1 02:25:22 2006
New Revision: 119395
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=119395
Log:
2006-12-01 Joseph Myers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
David E
--- Comment #6 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-23 00:16 ---
Patch was discussed at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-08/msg00451.html
and had some objections from Geoff Keating.
I've come across another problem case and am testing another possible patch to
address both ca
--- Comment #5 from dje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-17 02:05 ---
Created an attachment (id=11902)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11902&action=view)
consistently calculate nregs for FLOAT_MODES
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24036
--- Comment #4 from dje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-17 01:43 ---
Double Complex on e500 with double GPRs fundamentally does not interact well
with GCC's current design. GCC does not want to have a double placed in the
same register that can contain an int if the width of the register
--- Comment #3 from dje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-14 19:11 ---
This is because the E500 DOUBLE support wasn't prepared for complex doubles.
Index: rs6000.c
===
--- rs6000.c(revision 115431)
+++ rs6000.c(working
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-30 05:47 ---
Confirmed on the mainline.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
What|Removed |Added
Component|middle-end |target
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug
