--- Comment #7 from martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de 2005-11-01 10:22
---
The regression is unfortunately still there :(
Reducing the testcase is really hard, and I have some indications
that the problem vanishes if there is less work to do in the critical loop.
If you have any sug
--- Comment #6 from hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-31 18:24 ---
I don't have P4 to test handy. Can you re-test whether fixing 23302 (23303 is
invalid) make any difference?
I doubt these two make actual runtime changes - the sequence would translate to
same uops for P4 and should
--- Comment #5 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-31 05:01
---
Leaving as P2.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23378
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |minor
GCC build triplet|i686-pc-linux-gnu |
GCC host tr
--- Additional Comments From martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de
2005-08-16 08:33 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Ouch. This badly needs reducing...
Absolutely. But since Andrew pointed out that it is probably related to PR 23302
and PR 23303 (which have nice testcases), I suggest I
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-14
14:06 ---
I think this is related to PR 23302 and PR 23303 since those look like they
were caused by the same
patch.
--
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-14
13:57 ---
Ouch. This badly needs reducing...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23378
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot
||org
Component|pending
