--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-27 16:48 ---
Closing as fixed in 4.0.1.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From tg42 at gmx dot de 2005-08-14 19:40 ---
Meanwhile, i compiled the simd tests with gcc 4.0.1. It compiles them
correctly, i. e. the tests run successfully. It, again, uses the
movaps instruction, as does gcc 3.3.6 and unlike 3.4.4.
Since all these tests were
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-13
23:29 ---
This works in 3.4.0 on i686-pc-linux-gnu and binutils version 2.15.90.0.3
20040415 so I still think
this is not a GCC bug.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21833
--- Additional Comments From tg42 at gmx dot de 2005-08-13 23:28 ---
Again: this is NOT an alignment problem, as the structures ARE properly 16-byte
aligned (cf. addresses from gdb output).
What exactly cannot be reproduced: The code generated (movdqa?) or how the code
acts? On which pr
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-08
23:18 ---
I cannot reproduce this with 3.4.0, 4.0.0, or 4.1.0.
3.4.0 produces the same asm as you produced above.
I think this might be a binutils bug:
.comm k,16,16
.comm res,16,16
those are alig
--
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |target
Keywords||wrong-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id
