--- Additional Comments From drow at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-24 16:49
---
Joern, why are you committing patches to 4.0 without testing? The release isn't
_that_ imminent. Also, did you see Zack's suggestion? And Mark did ask that
no one add 4.0.0 milestones without talking to him
--- Additional Comments From joern dot rennecke at st dot com 2005-03-24
16:30 ---
Subject: Re: shared SH libgcc is exporting too many symbols
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> What|Removed |Added
>---
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-24
16:24 ---
Subject: Bug 20617
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-24 16:24:45
Modified files:
gcc: Change
--- Additional Comments From zack at codesourcery dot com 2005-03-24 16:06
---
Subject: Re: shared SH libgcc is exporting too many
symbols
Why not just add the problematic symbols to sh/libgcc-excl.ver? That
is what it is there for.
zw
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.c
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
||org
Severity|critical
--- Additional Comments From amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-24
12:12 ---
*** Bug 20616 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20617
--- Additional Comments From amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-24
11:43 ---
I propose to back out the sh specific part of the following patch on
the gcc 4.0 branch. This should be done before the 4.0 release, in
order to avoid people being stuck with shared objects that
reference s
