[Bug target/20497] Building Code on AMD 64bits c

2005-06-25 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-25 11:41 --- You can find how to download the hammer branch on http://gcc.gnu.org/cvs.html. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20497

[Bug target/20497] Building Code on AMD 64bits c

2005-06-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-22 00:19 --- No feedback in 3 months. -- What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING

[Bug target/20497] Building Code on AMD 64bits c

2005-03-22 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-23 05:37 --- Try with 3.4.3 as that is the current release of gcc. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20497

[Bug target/20497] Building Code on AMD 64bits c

2005-03-17 Thread ajve at chevrontexaco dot com
--- Additional Comments From ajve at chevrontexaco dot com 2005-03-17 21:34 --- I tried with GCC 3.3.4 but still its giving me the same error.I downloaded the GCC 3.3.4 from GNU site... -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20497

[Bug target/20497] Building Code on AMD 64bits c

2005-03-16 Thread ajve at chevrontexaco dot com
--- Additional Comments From ajve at chevrontexaco dot com 2005-03-17 00:11 --- (In reply to comment #4) > I can successfully compile your test case with the gcc that is shipped > with SUSE 9.2 ("gcc (GCC) 3.3.4 (pre 3.3.5 20040809)"). > > You say you are using GCC 3.3.2, but if you

[Bug target/20497] Building Code on AMD 64bits c

2005-03-16 Thread ajve at chevrontexaco dot com
--- Additional Comments From ajve at chevrontexaco dot com 2005-03-17 00:09 --- (In reply to comment #5) > I should notice I tried -O2 and -O3. If you used other flags, you > should report those too. Your bug report is not very detailed. > I am using -O3 -DNDEBUG -Wall flag. Pleas

[Bug target/20497] Building Code on AMD 64bits c

2005-03-16 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-17 00:06 --- I should notice I tried -O2 and -O3. If you used other flags, you should report those too. Your bug report is not very detailed. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20497

[Bug target/20497] Building Code on AMD 64bits c

2005-03-16 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-17 00:04 --- I can successfully compile your test case with the gcc that is shipped with SUSE 9.2 ("gcc (GCC) 3.3.4 (pre 3.3.5 20040809)"). You say you are using GCC 3.3.2, but if you have any influence on it I sugge

[Bug target/20497] Building Code on AMD 64bits c

2005-03-16 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-16 17:15 --- *** Bug 20498 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20497

[Bug target/20497] Building Code on AMD 64bits c

2005-03-16 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-16 17:11 --- See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions. We need the preprocessed source. -- What|Removed |Added -