[Bug target/20166] Bootstrap failure due to lack of fixinclude of pthread problem

2005-03-21 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-21 16:48 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug target/20166] Bootstrap failure due to lack of fixinclude of pthread problem

2005-03-21 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-21 16:46 --- Subject: Bug 20166 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-21 16:46:09 Modified files: fixincludes: ChangeLog inclhack.def fixincl.x

[Bug target/20166] Bootstrap failure due to lack of fixinclude of pthread problem

2005-03-21 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-21 16:18 --- Subject: Bug 20166 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-4_0-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-21 16:17:55 Modified files: fixincludes: Change

[Bug target/20166] Bootstrap failure due to lack of fixinclude of pthread problem

2005-03-20 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-20 17:39 --- (In reply to comment #12) > Patch here: > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-03/msg01377.html Note for fixinclude patches, Bruce Korb likes to be CCed on them. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[Bug target/20166] Bootstrap failure due to lack of fixinclude of pthread problem

2005-03-15 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-15 08:15 --- Patch here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-03/msg01377.html -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/20166] Bootstrap failure due to lack of fixinclude of pthread problem

2005-03-11 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-11 11:51 --- Just FYI, most distributions ship LinuxThreads headers by default and you need to specifically ask for NPTL headers ATM. Linking happens against LinuxThreads libraries as well by default, though NPTL is the d

[Bug target/20166] Bootstrap failure due to lack of fixinclude of pthread problem

2005-03-10 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-11 03:29 --- I've restored the target milestone for this bug, but made the priority P3. I think that it would be good to fix this bug, since these GLIBCs are out there in the wild. The right fix is indded to add that

[Bug target/20166] Bootstrap failure due to lack of fixinclude of pthread problem

2005-03-01 Thread themis_hv at yahoo dot co dot uk
--- Additional Comments From themis_hv at yahoo dot co dot uk 2005-03-01 19:33 --- Yes, glibc should have this code in the first place but we can not turn the clock back/time travel. Futhermore, I can reproduce it on i686-pc-linux-gnu with NPTL-enabled glibc-2.3.3 system using official

[Bug target/20166] Bootstrap failure due to lack of fixinclude of pthread problem

2005-03-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-01 17:05 --- Well considering this is glibc bug, yes this needs to be fixed but really glibc should have this code in the first place as it would break with -pedantic and they were using an undocumented extension. --

[Bug target/20166] Bootstrap failure due to lack of fixinclude of pthread problem

2005-03-01 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-01 16:01 --- We really need to fix this for 4.0.0 -- What|Removed |Added Severity|normal

[Bug target/20166] Bootstrap failure due to lack of fixinclude of pthread problem

2005-02-28 Thread themis_hv at yahoo dot co dot uk
--- Additional Comments From themis_hv at yahoo dot co dot uk 2005-02-28 20:47 --- For NPTL addon for glibc, it's been their since 12 April 2003, see http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/libc/nptl/sysdeps/pthread/pthread.h?cvsroot=glibc -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug

[Bug target/20166] Bootstrap failure due to lack of fixinclude of pthread problem

2005-02-28 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-28 18:28 --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #1) > > It is not just debian but anyone who used a bad glibc in the first place. I > have no idea when this was > > introduced at all. > It was introduced b

[Bug target/20166] Bootstrap failure due to lack of fixinclude of pthread problem

2005-02-24 Thread themis_hv at yahoo dot co dot uk
-- What|Removed |Added CC||themis_hv at yahoo dot co ||dot uk http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/

[Bug target/20166] Bootstrap failure due to lack of fixinclude of pthread problem

2005-02-24 Thread themis_hv at yahoo dot co dot uk
--- Additional Comments From themis_hv at yahoo dot co dot uk 2005-02-24 08:18 --- (In reply to comment #1) > It is not just debian but anyone who used a bad glibc in the first place. I have no idea when this was > introduced at all. It was introduced by fix for GCC Bug ID 19333 --

[Bug target/20166] Bootstrap failure due to lack of fixinclude of pthread problem

2005-02-23 Thread gschafer at zip dot com dot au
--- Additional Comments From gschafer at zip dot com dot au 2005-02-24 06:43 --- Here's the fix to pthread.h from Glibc cvs. I suppose the fixinclude "fix" would need to replicate this: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/glibc-cvs/2005-q1/msg00303.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_

[Bug target/20166] Bootstrap failure due to lack of fixinclude of pthread problem

2005-02-23 Thread gschafer at zip dot com dot au
--- Additional Comments From gschafer at zip dot com dot au 2005-02-24 04:39 --- This also happens for me on i686-pc-linux-gnu. It's a bog-standard unpatched NPTL-enabled glibc-2.3.4 system. I don't think it classifies as a "bad glibc". I concur that some fixincludes magic may be require

[Bug target/20166] Bootstrap failure due to lack of fixinclude of pthread problem

2005-02-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-23 15:01 --- It is not just debian but anyone who used a bad glibc in the first place. I have no idea when this was introduced at all. -- What|Removed |Added --