--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|3.4.4 |---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19672
--- Additional Comments From stephan dot bergmann at sun dot com
2005-01-31 09:09 ---
"I think you can get all the speed back by supplying -mbranch-cost=1 but I could
be wrong."
No, adding -mbranch-cost=1 leads to only a very minor performance improvement.
"Can you give the output of "
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-30
06:39 ---
Hmm, this looks like a branch cost problem or related to that.
I think you can get all the speed back by supplying -mbranch-cost=1 but I could
be wrong.
Hmm, I wonder if 3.2.x was compiled for i486 (or i3