--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19528
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-24
16:21 ---
Fixed by:
2005-01-24 J"orn Rennecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* sh.c (ra.h): Don't #include.
(hard_regs_intersect_p): New function, resurrected from ra.c.
* sh.c: Fix 1996 Copyright.
--
--- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com 2005-01-22 19:43
---
Subject: Re: [4.0 regression] missing ra.h
joel at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> --- Additional Comments From joel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-22
> 12:57 ---
> (In reply to comment #10)
>
>>Mark
--- Additional Comments From joel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-22 12:57
---
(In reply to comment #10)
> Mark, while you're using your RM powers to move the target milestone on
> this one, could you also please use your GWP powers to approve the simple
> patch http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gc
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-22
12:19 ---
Mark, while you're using your RM powers to move the target milestone on
this one, could you also please use your GWP powers to approve the simple
patch http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-01/msg01258.htm
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-21
17:33 ---
SH is not a primary or secondary platform; removing target milestone.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19
18:59 ---
Good. Ralf, can you post it?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19528
--- Additional Comments From corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19
16:35 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Steven, building cc1 to sh-unknown-elf with your patch succeeded.
Building sh-rtems4.7 with Steven's patch also succeeds.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19528
--
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19528
--
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19528
--- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19
13:47 ---
Steven, building cc1 to sh-unknown-elf with your patch succeeded.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19528
--- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19
13:27 ---
I've fixed the doc/passes.texi (commit in progress).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19528
--- Additional Comments From paolo dot bonzini at lu dot unisi dot ch
2005-01-19 12:55 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0 regression] missing ra.h
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> --- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19
> 12:26 ---
> ...and remove the #
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19
12:26 ---
...and remove the #include "ra.h" of course.
Paolo, you should also update doc/passes.texi, which also still
has references to new-ra.
--
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19
12:21 ---
I am not even going to try and look surprised, the SH port is a major
abuser of the middle-end. But of course, hard_regs_intersect_p should
have been in hard-reg-set.h from the start, *sigh*, mess-meets-me
15 matches
Mail list logo
