--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-26
09:18 ---
Honza, did you add the wrong PR number? I think you mean 19241...
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-26
08:07 ---
Subject: Bug 19421
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-26 08:07:05
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog tree-inline.c
Log message
--
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #7948 is|0 |1
obsolete||
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19421
--- Additional Comments From corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-23
12:26 ---
Created an attachment (id=8044)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8044&action=view)
Example 2 to reproduce the ICE
There seems to be some improvement on this PR. pr19421.c doesn't trigger
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-21
17:28 ---
m68k is not a primary or secondary platform; removing target milestone.
--
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Additional Comments From corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-14
15:15 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
I on Fedora Core 3 and am using FC3's toolchain.
> What options are used to configure gcc, maybe it has something to do
> with that (what I mean a different default CPU is done).
>
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-14
14:50 ---
What options are used to configure gcc, maybe it has something to do with that
(what I mean a
different default CPU is done).
I configured with "../configure --target=m68k-rtems4.7"
--
http://gcc.gnu.o
--- Additional Comments From joel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-14 14:45
---
Wierd.. we are on x86-gnu-linux so would be using a totally different host
compiler. I am using a gcc 3.4.3 and don't know what Ralf is using.
Does it fail when cc1 is compiled at a higher optimization level?
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-14
14:40 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > Hmm, I cannot reproduce it on 20050113 with a cross from ppc-darwin compiled
> at -O0.
>
> Can you reproduce it at -O2?
No what I had meant is that cc
--- Additional Comments From joel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-14 14:39
---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Hmm, I cannot reproduce it on 20050113 with a cross from ppc-darwin compiled
at -O0.
Can you reproduce it at -O2?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19421
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-14
14:18 ---
Hmm, I cannot reproduce it on 20050113 with a cross from ppc-darwin compiled at
-O0.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19421
--
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.0 regression] ICE with |[4.0 regression] ICE with
|solf-float on m68k |soft-float on m68k
http://gcc.gnu.o
12 matches
Mail list logo
