[Bug target/19399] [4.0 Regression] mutexes support broken

2005-01-13 Thread corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-13 17:04 --- Patches applied to trunk. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug target/19399] [4.0 Regression] mutexes support broken

2005-01-13 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-13 15:50 --- Subject: Bug 19399 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-13 15:50:13 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog gthr-rtems.h Log message:

[Bug target/19399] [4.0 Regression] mutexes support broken

2005-01-12 Thread corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-12 23:57 --- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #3) > What do you think of them? pr19399-try2.diff looks good to me. I've just launched local test-builds, nevertheless, OK to commit, IMO. I haven't looke

[Bug target/19399] [4.0 Regression] mutexes support broken

2005-01-12 Thread joel at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From joel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-12 17:15 --- (In reply to comment #3) > I think the most flexible and simple solution would be to add a > rtems_gxx_recursive_mutex_init to RTEMS. > > Also, I'd prefer to use this definition > typedef void * __gthread_re

[Bug target/19399] [4.0 Regression] mutexes support broken

2005-01-12 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added Component|c++ |target Known to work||3.4.0 Summary|gthread_recursive_mutex's |[