[Bug target/19144] SPARC back-end bug

2004-12-23 Thread bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
--- Additional Comments From bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com 2004-12-24 02:59 --- I looked at the .s files more closely and comment #7 might be off. Offsets seem to differ by either 4 or 8 not only 8 like I originally thought. I generated the .s files on HP-UX and it had the same

[Bug target/19144] SPARC back-end bug

2004-12-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-24 02:08 --- (In reply to comment #8) > Comment #7 should confirm this is a GCC bug. Not really, it just showed where the problem is. Can you try the mainline as there has been a couple of sparc bugs which have been f

[Bug target/19144] SPARC back-end bug

2004-12-23 Thread bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
--- Additional Comments From bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com 2004-12-24 02:04 --- Comment #7 should confirm this is a GCC bug. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19144

[Bug target/19144] SPARC back-end bug

2004-12-23 Thread bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
--- Additional Comments From bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com 2004-12-24 02:03 --- Ok, I ran diff on both .s files (id #7816 v id #7818) and found the following: @@ -199,8 +199,8 @@ cmp %g1, 0 bne .LL9 nop - add %fp, -80, %g1 -

[Bug target/19144] SPARC back-end bug

2004-12-23 Thread bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
--- Additional Comments From bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com 2004-12-24 01:59 --- Created an attachment (id=7818) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7818&action=view) .s file using patch in comment #1 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19144

[Bug target/19144] SPARC back-end bug

2004-12-23 Thread bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com
--- Additional Comments From bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com 2004-12-24 01:58 --- Created an attachment (id=7817) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7817&action=view) .ii file using patch in comment #1 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19144

[Bug target/19144] SPARC back-end bug

2004-12-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-24 01:57 --- This might not be a sparc back-end bug but a bug in the KDE, they might be overflowing the stack or something else. -- What|Removed |Added -