[Bug target/18912] FW: gcc 3.3.1 for Powerpc optimzation flag -Os generates bad code

2004-12-14 Thread atul dot sabharwal at tek dot com
--- Additional Comments From atul dot sabharwal at tek dot com 2004-12-14 17:53 --- This bug is fixed in 3.4.1 version of gcc. I received a cross compiled version of gcc for MPC8540 platform with the 3.4.1 gcc based tool chain and all busybox apps work correctly. -- http://gcc.gnu.

[Bug target/18912] FW: gcc 3.3.1 for Powerpc optimzation flag -Os generates bad code

2004-12-14 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-14 17:55 --- Closing as fixed then. -- What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING

[Bug target/18912] FW: gcc 3.3.1 for Powerpc optimzation flag -Os generates bad code

2004-12-09 Thread atul dot sabharwal at exgate dot tek dot com
build scripts and its using this new flag. -- Atul -Original Message- From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2004 2:04 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Bug target/18912] FW: gcc 3.3.1 for Powerpc optimzation flag -Os generates bad

[Bug target/18912] FW: gcc 3.3.1 for Powerpc optimzation flag -Os generates bad code

2004-12-09 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-09 22:03 --- Also does -mcpu=8540 fix the problem then when compiling? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18912

[Bug target/18912] FW: gcc 3.3.1 for Powerpc optimzation flag -Os generates bad code

2004-12-09 Thread atul dot sabharwal at exgate dot tek dot com
1:33 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Bug target/18912] FW: gcc 3.3.1 for Powerpc optimzation flag -Os generates bad code --- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-09 21:33 --- Hmm, you compiled for cpu=603 but the 82xx processor is not fully the same, also d

[Bug target/18912] FW: gcc 3.3.1 for Powerpc optimzation flag -Os generates bad code

2004-12-09 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-09 21:33 --- Hmm, you compiled for cpu=603 but the 82xx processor is not fully the same, also do you have a simple testcase? read also. -- What|Removed