--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18896
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2004-12-23
00:33 ---
Fixed mainline. gcc-3.4 not affected by this particular problem.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-23
00:11 ---
Subject: Bug 18896
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-23 00:10:50
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog function.c
Log message:
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2004-12-10
14:14 ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-12/msg00682.html
--
What|Removed |Added
K
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-09 06:58
---
I think the correct solution is to explicitly *clear* TREE_ADDRESSABLE in
split_complex_args and set DECL_ARTIFICIAL so that the two pieces get
allocated to pseudo registers. Then unsplit_complex needs to noti
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2004-12-09
05:51 ---
Fixing assign_parms_unsplit_complex
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned a
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2004-12-09
01:48 ---
Created an attachment (id=7709)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7709&action=view)
testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18896
