--- Comment #16 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2007-08-23 14:26 ---
Fixed.
--
ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #15 from uros at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-23 14:23 ---
Subject: Bug 17390
Author: uros
Date: Thu Aug 23 14:23:40 2007
New Revision: 127742
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=127742
Log:
PR target/17390
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_expand_
--- Comment #14 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2007-08-23 08:33 ---
Patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-08/msg01513.html.
This is target-only patch that fakes fcomi instructions. It doesn't need to
rescan insn stream and creates the same output as in Comment #8. It also
doesn
--- Comment #13 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2007-05-18 15:13 ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> ping
This patch needs to be ported to dataflow infrastructure [1] and has to be
re-thought a bit.
[1]: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-05/msg00040.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzi
--- Comment #12 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-10 23:15
---
ping
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17390
--- Comment #11 from pluto at agmk dot net 2006-07-25 11:33 ---
ping
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17390
--- Comment #10 from pluto at agmk dot net 2006-05-01 08:05 ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Created an attachment (id=10666)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10666&action=view) [edit]
> patch to SVN GCC: (GNU) 4.2.0 20060117 (experimental)
this patch ICEs recent x86-64
--- Comment #9 from uros at kss-loka dot si 2006-01-18 09:53 ---
Created an attachment (id=10666)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10666&action=view)
patch to SVN GCC: (GNU) 4.2.0 20060117 (experimental)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17390
--- Comment #8 from uros at kss-loka dot si 2006-01-18 09:50 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Hmm, I get (but that looks like different branch predictions):
It looks that your default is -mtune=pentium.
> _testf:
> fldl4(%esp)
> ftst
> fnstsw %ax
> t
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-18 04:57 ---
Hmm, I get (but that looks like different branch predictions):
_testf:
fldl4(%esp)
ftst
fnstsw %ax
testb $64, %ah
jne L10
ftst
fnstsw %ax
fs
--- Comment #6 from uros at kss-loka dot si 2005-10-24 06:29 ---
Some discussion can be found in this thread:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-10/msg00574.html
A new version of patch is here (post-reload machine dependant pass):
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-10/msg01298.html
--
--- Comment #5 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-19 13:13 ---
That patch is yet another example of why we constantly keep having compile time
problems. Just add more, and more, and more, and more. And act surprised when
someone notices that gcc 4.1 is four times as slow as 2.9
--- Comment #4 from uros at kss-loka dot si 2005-10-19 12:29 ---
Patch here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-10/msg01126.html
--
uros at kss-loka dot si changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
13 matches
Mail list logo
