https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14557
--- Comment #23 from nsz at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to felix from comment #21)
> > va_list ap2;
> > va_copy(ap2, ap);
>
> > and then use &ap2, this always works.
>
> > the proposed macros are both broken and unnecessary.
>
> That's not eq
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14557
--- Comment #22 from postmas...@flash-gordon-me-uk.bounceio.net ---
Your email was bounced...
-
... because something went wrong between you and your recipient. Oh
no!
What to do next?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14557
--- Comment #21 from felix ---
> va_list ap2;
> va_copy(ap2, ap);
> and then use &ap2, this always works.
> the proposed macros are both broken and unnecessary.
That's not equivalent. Using va_arg(ap2, T) does not propagate state changes
back
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14557
nsz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nsz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14557
felix changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||felix.von.s at posteo dot de
--- Comment #19 fro
--- Comment #18 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-10 15:46
---
*** Bug 27534 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #17 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-15 03:26
---
*** Bug 26294 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #16 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-07 17:12
---
*** Bug 8262 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-11
17:07 ---
*** Bug 20951 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
