https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120641
--- Comment #8 from Pierre Ossman ---
It seems strange to make life difficult for all ARM users, just to warn anyone
that might potentially use GCC 6 and GCC 15 at the same time.
Can we make sure that flag is the default in our build of the com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120641
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120641
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Pierre Ossman from comment #4)
> The error didn't indicate anything in our code, so I assumed this was
> entirely a standard library issue.
Has a reference to
GestureHandler::GHTouch
In the m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120641
--- Comment #5 from Pierre Ossman ---
Created attachment 61631
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61631&action=edit
GestureHandler.cxx.ii (xz compressed)
Preprocessed output as the result of this run:
> arm-none-linux-gnueabi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120641
--- Comment #4 from Pierre Ossman ---
The error didn't indicate anything in our code, so I assumed this was entirely
a standard library issue.
The file in question is this one:
https://github.com/TigerVNC/tigervnc/blob/master/vncviewer/Gesture
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120641
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-06-12
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120641
--- Comment #2 from Pierre Ossman ---
It's problematic when you are trying to adopt a "no warnings" approach to your
development. This severely undermines that, as you train the developers back in
to ignoring warning messages.
It also seems exc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120641
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
I am not sure this is not unwanted. The abi is changed between 6 and 7 (fixed
to be following the specs). And we are warning about that.
