https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117941
--- Comment #6 from Mathieu Othacehe ---
(In reply to Richard Earnshaw from comment #5)
> > Is it then possible to have dwarf data on ARM in addition to the EABI
> > defined unwind section?
>
> I don't know, honesty, because I've not tried it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117941
--- Comment #5 from Richard Earnshaw ---
> Is it then possible to have dwarf data on ARM in addition to the EABI defined
> unwind section?
I don't know, honesty, because I've not tried it. I'd be surprised if it worked
though, at least, not wi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117941
--- Comment #4 from Mathieu Othacehe ---
(In reply to Richard Earnshaw from comment #3)
> The Arm unwind section tables are defined by the Arm EABI; they only provide
> enough data for call-based exceptions to be unwound. It is not the same as
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117941
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
