--- Comment #6 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-15 20:52
---
Fixed on mainline, and not appropriate for backporting.
--
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #5 from sandra at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-24 23:54 ---
Subject: Bug 11787
Author: sandra
Date: Fri Aug 24 23:54:05 2007
New Revision: 127790
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=127790
Log:
2007-08-24 Sandra Loosemore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
N
--- Additional Comments From echristo at redhat dot com 2005-04-06 18:57
---
There's also the problem that the current mechanism for doing unaligned
loads/stores are not valid mips16 instructions, and therefore we couldn't rely
upon the patterns unless we knew that the addresses were ali
--- Additional Comments From stephane dot mutz at philips dot com
2005-04-06 08:07 ---
I understand your point. However, this sometimes results in a significant drop
of performance forcing to revert to MIPS2 / MIPS32. This partly spoils the
usefulness of MIPS16. I think the option of f
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |echristo at redhat dot com
|dot org |
Status|WAITING
--- Additional Comments From echristo at redhat dot com 2005-04-05 21:23
---
The point of mips16 is smaller code, why would you expect inline memcpy calls at
any point?
-eric
--
What|Removed |Added
