[Bug target/117697] gcc.target/i386/avx10_2-vmovd-1.c etc. FAIL

2024-11-22 Thread haochen.jiang at intel dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117697 --- Comment #9 from Haochen Jiang --- (In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #8) > > --- Comment #7 from Haochen Jiang --- > > Testcase fixed on trunk. > > Great, thanks. > > > Since I do not have a Solaris machine, I could n

[Bug target/117697] gcc.target/i386/avx10_2-vmovd-1.c etc. FAIL

2024-11-22 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117697 --- Comment #10 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- >> Even more strangely, I'd tried an i686-pc-linux-gnu build with >> --enable-frame-pointer (the Solaris default), which showed the testsuite >> failures before your patch, but still -f

[Bug target/117697] gcc.target/i386/avx10_2-vmovd-1.c etc. FAIL

2024-11-22 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117697 --- Comment #8 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #7 from Haochen Jiang --- > Testcase fixed on trunk. Great, thanks. > Since I do not have a Solaris machine, I could not to solve the problem on > Solaris/x86 for: > >>

[Bug target/117697] gcc.target/i386/avx10_2-vmovd-1.c etc. FAIL

2024-11-21 Thread haochen.jiang at intel dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117697 --- Comment #7 from Haochen Jiang --- Testcase fixed on trunk. Since I do not have a Solaris machine, I could not to solve the problem on Solaris/x86 for: > Weirdly, adding -fomit-frame-pointer to the testcases > make no difference on Solaris

[Bug target/117697] gcc.target/i386/avx10_2-vmovd-1.c etc. FAIL

2024-11-21 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117697 --- Comment #6 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Haochen Jiang : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:45135f9d5f7316d1256813d808b0f37287ba77d3 commit r15-5582-g45135f9d5f7316d1256813d808b0f37287ba77d3 Author: Haochen Jiang Date: T

[Bug target/117697] gcc.target/i386/avx10_2-vmovd-1.c etc. FAIL

2024-11-20 Thread liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117697 Hongtao Liu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug target/117697] gcc.target/i386/avx10_2-vmovd-1.c etc. FAIL

2024-11-20 Thread haochen.jiang at intel dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117697 --- Comment #5 from Haochen Jiang --- Patch with change Hongtao proposed: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-November/669647.html

[Bug target/117697] gcc.target/i386/avx10_2-vmovd-1.c etc. FAIL

2024-11-20 Thread haochen.jiang at intel dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117697 --- Comment #3 from Haochen Jiang --- Proposed change: diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/avx10_2-vmovd-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/avx10_2-vmovd-1.c index 6a5d84ac6cd..be1631f3060 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/avx1

[Bug target/117697] gcc.target/i386/avx10_2-vmovd-1.c etc. FAIL

2024-11-20 Thread haochen.jiang at intel dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117697 --- Comment #2 from Haochen Jiang --- I see, let me change that.

[Bug target/117697] gcc.target/i386/avx10_2-vmovd-1.c etc. FAIL

2024-11-20 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117697 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||testsuite-fail --- Comment #1 from Ric

[Bug target/117697] gcc.target/i386/avx10_2-vmovd-1.c etc. FAIL

2024-11-20 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117697 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |15.0