[Bug target/117344] Suboptimal use of movprfx in SVE intrinsics code due to hard register for return register or argument passing

2024-10-29 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117344 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- The way cond_addvnx4si_2 is written currently is: ;; Predicated integer operations, merging with the first input. (define_insn "*cond__2" [(set (match_operand:SVE_I 0 "register_operand") (unspec:SV

[Bug target/117344] Suboptimal use of movprfx in SVE intrinsics code

2024-10-29 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117344 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ra Ever confirmed|0