https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116504
--- Comment #8 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
So for the record. Both testcases failed for me with QEMU. THe first case
worked on real hardware while the second testcase failed on real hardware.
I'm digging data out of an old email, so no clear indi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116504
--- Comment #7 from Zdenek Sojka ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #4)
> It's not failing for me, either when using QEMU or when running the
> resultant binary on the BPI.
>
> Zdenek, can you (privately) pass along the resulting bina
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116504
--- Comment #6 from Zdenek Sojka ---
Created attachment 59043
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59043&action=edit
assembly output for the second testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116504
--- Comment #5 from Zdenek Sojka ---
Created attachment 59042
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59042&action=edit
assembly output for the first testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116504
--- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
It's not failing for me, either when using QEMU or when running the resultant
binary on the BPI.
Zdenek, can you (privately) pass along the resulting binary you're testing.
It's pretty easy for me to run
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116504
--- Comment #3 from Zdenek Sojka ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> when using qemu please always specify the version used
Thank you for the feedback:
$ qemu-riscv64 --version
qemu-riscv64 version 9.0.2
Copyright (c) 2003-2024 F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116504
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
when using qemu please always specify the version used
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116504
--- Comment #1 from Zdenek Sojka ---
Created attachment 59015
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59015&action=edit
another reduced testcase
