https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111295
Jeremy Bennett changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111295
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Pan Li :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1b4c70d4271a00514ae20970d483c3b78d9d66ef
commit r14-3743-g1b4c70d4271a00514ae20970d483c3b78d9d66ef
Author: Juzhe-Zhong
Date: Wed Sep 6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111295
--- Comment #5 from JuzheZhong ---
I see. A candidate patch to fix this issue:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-September/629456.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111295
--- Comment #4 from Jeremy Bennett ---
@JuzheZhong - it's a C test case, not C++. Look like you are trying to
compile it as C++.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111295
--- Comment #3 from JuzheZhong ---
This code can not be compiled:
cc1plus: warning: command-line option '-Wno-implicit-function-declaration' is
valid for C/ObjC but not for C++
bug.C: In function 'int q()':
bug.C:6:9: warning: empty parentheses
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111295
JuzheZhong changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111295
--- Comment #1 from Jeremy Bennett ---
Further analysis suggests this also causes the following SPEC CPU 2017
benchmarks to fail: 602.gcc_s, 648.exchange2_s, 607.cactuBSSN_s, 621.wrf_s,
627.cam4_s, 628.pop2_s, 638.imagick_s, 649.fotonik3d_s and