https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108738
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108738
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6010189923908501ca5b02bd1f4aee05d2283118
commit r13-6439-g6010189923908501ca5b02bd1f4aee05d2283118
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108738
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
So it's now better than before but still quadratic.
Finding a strathegic place to limit the search with some --param might be a
solution, but there's no easy
point to hook that into. You'd not want to dis
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108738
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e1dfac7e71056e879f101fef1c5ecb8ff6be1a1f
commit r13-5995-ge1dfac7e71056e879f101fef1c5ecb8ff6be1a1f
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108738
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ec23e9e25eb64bb066dc408fd498861b8587bec8
commit r13-5994-gec23e9e25eb64bb066dc408fd498861b8587bec8
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108738
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
The odd thing is that DF_REF_CHAIN of a USE ref contains _all_ definitions of
the pseudo while DF_REF_CHAIN of a DEF ref contains only reaching uses!?
Probably an artifact of how df_chain_create_bb_process
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108738
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
That brings it down to
machine dep reorg : 87.09 ( 28%)
let me see if there's something else obvious to do.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108738
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-02-09
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108738
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*
--- Comment #1 from Richard
