[Bug target/108293] Incorrect assembly emitted for float for BPF target

2023-01-11 Thread jemarch at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108293 Jose E. Marchesi changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/108293] Incorrect assembly emitted for float for BPF target

2023-01-11 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108293 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by David Faust : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c7279270a2deda81eaeba37a87d721bee0ed6004 commit r13-5110-gc7279270a2deda81eaeba37a87d721bee0ed6004 Author: David Faust Date: Tue J

[Bug target/108293] Incorrect assembly emitted for float for BPF target

2023-01-06 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108293 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Last reconfi

[Bug target/108293] Incorrect assembly emitted for float for BPF target

2023-01-05 Thread jemarch at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108293 --- Comment #3 from Jose E. Marchesi --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2) > Another thing is that at least for all SFmode constant one could use mov > instead of lddw. For this I guess we could expand the "I" constraint to cover cons

[Bug target/108293] Incorrect assembly emitted for float for BPF target

2023-01-05 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108293 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Another thing is that at least for all SFmode constant one could use mov instead of lddw.

[Bug target/108293] Incorrect assembly emitted for float for BPF target

2023-01-05 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108293 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1