[Bug target/106691] Section anchors is not efficient for riscv

2025-06-22 Thread law at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106691 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Status|NEW

[Bug target/106691] Section anchors is not efficient for riscv

2022-08-19 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106691 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Waterman from comment #3) > Relaxation to gp happens at link time Doing any kind of relaxation like this is REALLY REALLY BAD at link time. Sorry but the whole relaxation in the RISCV li

[Bug target/106691] Section anchors is not efficient for riscv

2022-08-19 Thread andrew at sifive dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106691 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Waterman --- Relaxation to gp happens at link time, and because of the relatively small load/store offsets, the small-data limit is actually useful. I don't think we should turn it off, because when we relax to gp, we

[Bug target/106691] Section anchors is not efficient for riscv

2022-08-19 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106691 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Summary|Section anchors