https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105719
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105719
--- Comment #6 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #4)
> Created attachment 55084 [details]
> Implement the use of fixed framework headers
>
> this was a proof-of-principle exercise while looking into issues caused by
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105719
--- Comment #5 from Bruce Korb ---
It's been a long time since I mucked with fixincludes. My first guess, without
going back and reading code, would be to provide fixincludes with a list of
trees to traverse and not have it burned into fixinclud
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105719
--- Comment #4 from Iain Sandoe ---
Created attachment 55084
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55084&action=edit
Implement the use of fixed framework headers
this was a proof-of-principle exercise while looking into issues ca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105719
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105719
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105719
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-05-24
Status|UNCONFIRM