[Bug target/105472] [13 regression] .note.GNU-stack breaks many Solaris/x86 tests

2022-05-10 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105472 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|WAITING

[Bug target/105472] [13 regression] .note.GNU-stack breaks many Solaris/x86 tests

2022-05-10 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105472 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6b5ca56fec4f713add424a5131350b28ce81e9da commit r11-9976-g6b5ca56fec4f713add424a5131350b28ce81e9da Author: H.J. Lu Date: Fri

[Bug target/105472] [13 regression] .note.GNU-stack breaks many Solaris/x86 tests

2022-05-10 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105472 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ab8a8d053734d6abc6ee9c5bfb772ff95ba74fc9 commit r12-8363-gab8a8d053734d6abc6ee9c5bfb772ff95ba74fc9 Author: H.J. Lu Date: Fri

[Bug target/105472] [13 regression] .note.GNU-stack breaks many Solaris/x86 tests

2022-05-10 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105472 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:71eae0fd3dd7a5f30067ea26a06a8774355fd5cc commit r13-276-g71eae0fd3dd7a5f30067ea26a06a8774355fd5cc Author: H.J. Lu Date: Fri May 6 10:5

[Bug target/105472] [13 regression] .note.GNU-stack breaks many Solaris/x86 tests

2022-05-09 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105472 --- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- > Created attachment 52935 > --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52935&action=edit > A patch This fixed all the failures. Thanks.

[Bug target/105472] [13 regression] .note.GNU-stack breaks many Solaris/x86 tests

2022-05-06 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105472 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING

[Bug target/105472] [13 regression] .note.GNU-stack breaks many Solaris/x86 tests

2022-05-06 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105472 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- Created attachment 52935 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52935&action=edit A patch

[Bug target/105472] [13 regression] .note.GNU-stack breaks many Solaris/x86 tests

2022-05-06 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105472 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug target/105472] [13 regression] .note.GNU-stack breaks many Solaris/x86 tests

2022-05-06 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105472 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #0) > > The usual way throughout the code base is to guard .note.GNU-stack with > __ELF__ && __linux__ to avoid all this. Isn't checking __linux__ sufficient?

[Bug target/105472] [13 regression] .note.GNU-stack breaks many Solaris/x86 tests

2022-05-04 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105472 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-05-04 Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug target/105472] [13 regression] .note.GNU-stack breaks many Solaris/x86 tests

2022-05-04 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105472 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |13.0