https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104781
Bug 104781 depends on bug 104890, which changed state.
Bug 104890 Summary: [11 Regression] doesn't work with
__attribute__((target ("general-regs-only"))) and -march=i686
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104890
What|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104781
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek ---
r12-7654-gda24fce323eaf088 should fix that.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104781
Ulrich Drepper changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||drepper.fsp+rhbz at gmail dot
com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104781
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104781
--- Comment #12 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> I believe this should now be fixed, Rainer, can you please confirm?
It is: last night's i386-pc-solaris2.11 bootstraps were fine without any
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104781
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I believe this should now be fixed, Rainer, can you please confirm?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104781
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104781
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:caa6c33c5d5223c50657b08e73177e8d54ceee51
commit r12-7565-gcaa6c33c5d5223c50657b08e73177e8d54ceee51
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104781
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:23ed4df521db9d66782d3f9cf291fc2564cf313a
commit r12-7539-g23ed4df521db9d66782d3f9cf291fc2564cf313a
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Fri Mar 4 05:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104781
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104781
--- Comment #7 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu ---
> Created attachment 52567
> --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52567&action=edit
> The v2 patch
>
> Please test this patch.
This ve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104781
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #52563|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104781
--- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
> Created attachment 52563
> --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52563&action=edit
> A patch
>
> Try this.
That patch certainly did f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104781
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #3)
> Comment on attachment 52563 [details]
> A patch
>
> >From ba4854c13c4aaa5b50127f23cb09cf05e3eb229d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> >From: "H.J. Lu"
> >Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2022
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104781
--- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Comment on attachment 52563
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52563
A patch
>From ba4854c13c4aaa5b50127f23cb09cf05e3eb229d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>From: "H.J. Lu"
>Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2022
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104781
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-03-04
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104781
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth ---
Indeed: with the patch reverted, I'm now running make compare.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104781
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
18 matches
Mail list logo
