[Bug target/101696] Function multiversioning not usable with new x86-64-v*

2021-09-13 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101696 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug target/101696] Function multiversioning not usable with new x86-64-v*

2021-09-13 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101696 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8ea292591e42aa4d52b4b7a00b86335bfd2e2e85 commit r12-3494-g8ea292591e42aa4d52b4b7a00b86335bfd2e2e85 Author: Martin Liska Date: Th

[Bug target/101696] Function multiversioning not usable with new x86-64-v*

2021-08-16 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101696 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0

[Bug target/101696] Function multiversioning not usable with new x86-64-v*

2021-08-12 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101696 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch Status|NEW

[Bug target/101696] Function multiversioning not usable with new x86-64-v*

2021-08-11 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101696 --- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu --- Created attachment 51290 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51290&action=edit A patch Try this.

[Bug target/101696] Function multiversioning not usable with new x86-64-v*

2021-08-11 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101696 --- Comment #7 from Martin Liška --- > It is very difficult to add them to __builtin_cpu_is since there are no > such processors. I see! > However, add them to __builtin_cpu_supports is possible. Please do so we can then leverage that in the

[Bug target/101696] Function multiversioning not usable with new x86-64-v*

2021-08-11 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101696 --- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #5) > Right now, the x86-64* are defined as aliases to k8: > > {"x86-64", PROCESSOR_K8, CPU_K8, PTA_X86_64_BASELINE, 0, P_NONE}, > {"x86-64-v2", PROCESSOR_K8, CPU_GENERI

[Bug target/101696] Function multiversioning not usable with new x86-64-v*

2021-08-11 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101696 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW CC|

[Bug target/101696] Function multiversioning not usable with new x86-64-v*

2021-08-03 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101696 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug target/101696] Function multiversioning not usable with new x86-64-v*

2021-08-03 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101696 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/101696] Function multiversioning not usable with new x86-64-v*

2021-08-03 Thread h2+bugs at fsfe dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101696 --- Comment #2 from Hannes Hauswedell --- What do you mean with "It doesn't work this way"? Maybe I wasn't clear in my original post; I am not interested in a dispatching mechanism for the application, I just want to have an mini-application th

[Bug target/101696] Function multiversioning not usable with new x86-64-v*

2021-08-02 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101696 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---