https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93433
--- Comment #7 from Roland Illig ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #6)
> (In reply to Roland Illig from comment #4)
> > Reported as https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93433
> >
>
> Hello.
>
> You probably posted a wrong link
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93433
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Roland Illig from comment #4)
> Reported as https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93433
>
Hello.
You probably posted a wrong link. I would expect one to LLVM bugzilla.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93433
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Roland Illig from comment #4)
> Reported as https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93433
>
> The description of the Bugzilla component called "sanitizer" should be
> corrected. Currently i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93433
--- Comment #4 from Roland Illig ---
Reported as https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93433
The description of the Bugzilla component called "sanitizer" should be
corrected. Currently it reads as if I should report any libsanitizer bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93433
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Roland Illig from comment #2)
> But why is there a bug category called sanitizer then, which even mentions
> libsanitizer?
Because some things are specific to gcc. Like the configure and the mak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93433
--- Comment #2 from Roland Illig ---
But why is there a bug category called sanitizer then, which even mentions
libsanitizer?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93433
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
