[Bug sanitizer/88400] address-sanitizer on the cpu with only one core, may deadlock

2018-12-13 Thread He.Hongjun at zte dot com.cn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88400 --- Comment #5 from hhj --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2) > Please provide a testcase to reproduce the issue. Also note that GCC 6 is > no longer supported. This sounds like an issue in the libsanitizer > interceptor > to me, the

[Bug sanitizer/88400] address-sanitizer on the cpu with only one core, may deadlock

2018-12-07 Thread He.Hongjun at zte dot com.cn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88400 --- Comment #4 from hhj --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) > Also this seems like it is an upstream issue too. This is how we handle it. When the parent's sched_priority isn't sam as the children's 1 If the parent's sched_priority

[Bug sanitizer/88400] address-sanitizer on the cpu with only one core, may deadlock

2018-12-07 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88400 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- Also this seems like it is an upstream issue too.

[Bug sanitizer/88400] address-sanitizer on the cpu with only one core, may deadlock

2018-12-07 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88400 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Please provide a testcase to reproduce the issue. Also note that GCC 6 is no longer supported. This sounds like an issue in the libsanitizer interceptor to me, the pthread_create interceptor does // W

[Bug sanitizer/88400] address-sanitizer on the cpu with only one core, may deadlock

2018-12-07 Thread He.Hongjun at zte dot com.cn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88400 hhj changed: What|Removed |Added CC||He.Hongjun at zte dot com.cn --- Comment #1 from h