https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70541
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70541
--- Comment #5 from chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: chefmax
Date: Fri Apr 8 10:46:13 2016
New Revision: 234827
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234827&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-04-08 Maxim Ostapenko
PR sanitizer/70541
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70541
--- Comment #4 from Maxim Ostapenko ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> (In reply to Maxim Ostapenko from comment #1)
> > @@ -2060,7 +2067,20 @@ maybe_instrument_call (gimple_stmt_iterator *iter)
> >return true;
> > }
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70541
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Maxim Ostapenko from comment #1)
> @@ -2060,7 +2067,20 @@ maybe_instrument_call (gimple_stmt_iterator *iter)
>return true;
> }
If the function call returns a struct, then your patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70541
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70541
Maxim Ostapenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m.ostapenko at samsung dot com
--- Com
