[Bug sanitizer/59106] Failure to link against static libasan

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59106 Yury Gribov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug sanitizer/59106] Failure to link against static libasan

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59106 --- Comment #19 from ygribov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ygribov Date: Thu Nov 28 12:20:23 2013 New Revision: 205482 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205482&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2013-11-28 Jakub Jelinek Yury Gribov PR san

[Bug sanitizer/59106] Failure to link against static libasan

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59106 --- Comment #18 from Yury Gribov --- Created attachment 31233 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31233&action=edit Libubsan -fno-rtti patch (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #16) > See my http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2

[Bug sanitizer/59106] Failure to link against static libasan

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59106 --- Comment #17 from ygribov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ygribov Date: Mon Nov 18 08:03:16 2013 New Revision: 204934 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204934&root=gcc&view=rev Log: libsanitizer: 2013-11-18 Yury Gribov PR sanitizer/591

[Bug sanitizer/59106] Failure to link against static libasan

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59106 --- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek --- See my http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-11/msg01874.html, that should fix that -ldl -lpthread already.

[Bug sanitizer/59106] Failure to link against static libasan

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59106 --- Comment #15 from Kostya Serebryany --- (In reply to Yury Gribov from comment #14) > Sent to gcc-patches: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-11/msg01990.html > > As for libubsan, it does not seem to support static link anyway: you need -l

[Bug sanitizer/59106] Failure to link against static libasan

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59106 --- Comment #14 from Yury Gribov --- Sent to gcc-patches: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-11/msg01990.html As for libubsan, it does not seem to support static link anyway: /home/ygribov/install/gcc-master/bin/gcc -g repro.i -fsanitize=un

[Bug sanitizer/59106] Failure to link against static libasan

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59106 --- Comment #13 from Kostya Serebryany --- > Did it work with the patch? Yes!

[Bug sanitizer/59106] Failure to link against static libasan

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59106 --- Comment #12 from Yury Gribov --- (In reply to Kostya Serebryany from comment #11) > The build barks as in this bug Did it work with the patch?

[Bug sanitizer/59106] Failure to link against static libasan

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59106 --- Comment #11 from Kostya Serebryany --- Trying to build chrome with gcc's asan... The build barks as in this bug -- we do need to build libsanitizer (at least asan) with -fno-rtti

[Bug sanitizer/59106] Failure to link against static libasan

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59106 Yury Gribov changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #31207|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug sanitizer/59106] Failure to link against static libasan

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59106 Kostya Serebryany changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nlewycky at google dot com --- Commen

[Bug sanitizer/59106] Failure to link against static libasan

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59106 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Alexey Samsonov from comment #4) > Yeah, in LLVM/Clang we build C++-specific part of UBSan with -frtti (and > link it to C++ programs only), and the rest sanitizers with -fno-rtti. Can't we just

[Bug sanitizer/59106] Failure to link against static libasan

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59106 --- Comment #7 from Kostya Serebryany --- Patch looks ok. Please send it in a usual way and someone else (Jakub?) will need to approve it.

[Bug sanitizer/59106] Failure to link against static libasan

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59106 Yury Gribov changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #31206|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug sanitizer/59106] Failure to link against static libasan

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59106 --- Comment #5 from Kostya Serebryany --- a small part of ubsan does indeed require rtti. See ubsan/CMakeLists.txt (UBSAN_SOURCES vs UBSAN_CXX_SOURCES) The rest of libsanitizer does not and should use -fno-rtti. OMG, I hate having so many diffe

[Bug sanitizer/59106] Failure to link against static libasan

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59106 Alexey Samsonov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||samsonov at google dot com --- Comment

[Bug sanitizer/59106] Failure to link against static libasan

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59106 --- Comment #3 from Yury Gribov --- (In reply to Kostya Serebryany from comment #2) > We should be building libsanitizer with -fno-rtti Ubsan seems to require it: /home/ygribov/gcc/gcc-master/libsanitizer/ubsan/ubsan_type_hash.cc:121:63: error:

[Bug sanitizer/59106] Failure to link against static libasan

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59106 --- Comment #2 from Kostya Serebryany --- We should be building libsanitizer with -fno-rtti

[Bug sanitizer/59106] Failure to link against static libasan

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59106 --- Comment #1 from Yury Gribov --- Created attachment 31206 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31206&action=edit Proposed patch Does this look sane?