[Bug sanitizer/56682] -fsanitize documentation

2018-12-05 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56682 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Maybe for leak, not sure about that. For UBSan I think it isn't needed.

[Bug sanitizer/56682] -fsanitize documentation

2018-12-04 Thread sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56682 --- Comment #4 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Is -g also recommended for the other -fsanitize= options?

[Bug sanitizer/56682] -fsanitize documentation

2018-11-26 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56682 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- I really believe there's no need for any extra options on top of -sanitize={address,thread} right now. The only recommendation would be about the -g option in order to have nice backtraces and variable locati

[Bug sanitizer/56682] -fsanitize documentation

2018-11-25 Thread sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56682 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dodji at gcc dot gnu.org,